Epistemic game theory ∗
نویسنده
چکیده
2 Main ingredients 5 2.1 Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2 Strategic-form games . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.3 Belief hierarchies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.4 Type structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.5 Rationality and belief . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.6 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.6.1 State dependence and non-expected utility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.6.2 Elicitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.6.3 Introspective beliefs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.6.4 Semantic/syntactic models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
منابع مشابه
Investigation and Model checking of Algorithms of Eliminations in Game Theory based on Dynamic Epistemic Logic
The core of game theory is looking for the solution of game problems. Various algorithms of iterated elimination are significant for the rapid reduction of game models and seeking reasonable Nash equilibria. The traditional framework of game analysis assumes that game players are Bayesian rational, and that "every player is rational" is common knowledge among the players. However, game theory i...
متن کاملFrom Classical to Epistemic Game Theory
In this paper we give a historical overview of the transition from classical game theory to epistemic game theory. To that purpose we will discuss how important notions such as reasoning about the opponents, belief hierarchies, common belief, and the concept of common belief in rationality arose, and gradually entered the game theoretic picture, thereby giving birth to the field of epistemic ga...
متن کاملEpistemic logics and their game theoretic applications: Introduction
This paper is written as an introduction to epistemic logics and their game theoretic applications. It starts with both semantics and syntax of classical logic, and goes to the Hilbert-style proof-theory and Kripke-style model theory of epistemic logics. In these theories, we discuss individual decision making in some simple game examples. In particular, we will discuss the distinction between ...
متن کاملEpistemic Game Theory and Logic: Introduction
Epistemic game theory and the systems of logic that support it are crucial for understanding rational behavior in interactive situations in which the outcome for an agent depends, not just on her own behavior, but also on the behavior of those with whom she is interacting. Scholars in many fields study such interactive situations, that is, games of strategy. Epistemic game theory presents the e...
متن کاملEpistemic Logic and the Foundations of Decision and Game Theory
This paper reviews a number of foundational results at the intersection of epistemic logic, decision and game theory. It first presents a decisiontheoretic underpinning of epistemic analysis in terms of modal operators. Then it moves to the theory of strategic interaction, and show how this kind of epistemic analysis sheds light on the assumptions underlying wellknown solution concepts, both fo...
متن کاملTR-2010002: Reasoning About Games
A mixture of propositional dynamic logic and epistemic logic is used to give a formalization of Artemov’s knowledge based reasoning approach to game theory, (KBR), [4, 5, 6, 7]. We call the (family of) logics used here PDL + E. It is in the general family of Dynamic Epistemic Logics [21], was applied to games already in [20], and investigated further in [18, 19]. Epistemic states of players, us...
متن کامل